Dean H. Stamatis (1996).
Total Quality Service: Principles, Practices, and Implementation
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Clifford I. Nass, Yongme Moon, John Morkes, Eun-Young Kim, and B.J. Fogg (1999).
Computers are social actors: A Review of current research. Batya Friedman (Ed.)
Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology.
Stanford, CA: Cambridge University Press (pages 137-162).
Judith Baxter (2003).
Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology
Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Richard E. Potter, Robert A. Cooke, Pierre A. Balthazard (2000).
Virtual Team Interaction: Assessment, Consequences, and Management.
Team Performance Management.
Volume 6, Issue 7/8 (Pages 131-137).
Richard E. Potter and Pierre A. Balthazard (2002).
Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects International Journal of Human-Computer Studies`
Volume 56, Issue 4, (Pages 423–443).
Nicole Skibola (2011).
Mindfulness as a tool for organizational and social change
Forbes Corporate Responsibility Blog
Dabbs, J. M. & Ruback, R. B. (1987). Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of vocal interaction. In Berkowitz. L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Volume 20. San Diego CA: Academic Press, 123-170.
Dyer, W. G. (1987). Team building: Issues and alternatives (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, p. 75.
Hauber, J., Regenbrecht, H., Hills, A., Cockburn, A., and Billinghurst, M. (2005). Social presence in two- and three-dimensional videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the 8th annual international workshop on presence. London, 189-198
Prebble, R. (2006). Out of the red. Rotorua NZ.
Rus, D., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse. B. (2012). Leader power and self-serving behavior: The moderating role of accountability. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 13-26.
Silberman, M. L. (1990). Active training: A handbook of techniques, designs, case examples, and tips. New York, NY: Lexington, pp. 100-101.
Witte, E. H. (2007). Toward a group facilitation techniques for project teams. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations., 10, 299-309.
An outstanding way to prove the point that teams outperform individuals is to engage people in an exercise like Desert Survival… The teams almost always outperform the individuals and, if they do not, the reason can usually be traced to poor functioning of the team.
Listening costs money because it is time consuming. However, in the end it saves money because mistakes are corrected, potential problems are avoided, and more creative and cost-effective solutions are generated. …the Desert Survival Situation, demonstrated that teams with good listening skills consistently outperformed teams where the members did not listen to each other.
Glenn M. Parker, 25 Instruments for Team Development
Finally, the best thinking very often results from a team effort. With few exceptions, repeated research has established that groups are usually better than individuals at solving problems where no one has deep or relevant experience…. A forceful example is an exercise called the Desert Survival Situation.
A technique used widely in helping groups to understand the value added from team performance is a classroom exercise designed to demonstrate synergy…. The parallel between lessons learned from this exercise and those learned in many aircraft accidents is more than casual.
I had been skeptical about the exercise, but it worked…. It turned out to be a particularly appropriate exercise for the first day, as it came so close to some of our real survival emotions.
In the afternoon, we divided into our old study groups and had to face the highlight of our trip to Half Moon Bay, a group test: The Desert Survival scenario.
Students discover through this exercise that applying the interaction method, the problem-solving process, and the various tools presents much more of a challenge than they had expected. Their realization stimulates them to work on mastering this material during the succeeding projects.
I met recently with the executive director of a U.S. association that works with CEOs of Chinese companies as they seek to become listed on U.S. stock exchanges. We discussed my law practice and my time in China teaching law at Tsinghua University, but he was most interested in my experience with Desert Survival, the classic teambuilding exercise. He said that a real need for this type of skill existed within Chinese companies.
By comparing individual strategies with team consensus, the exercise graphically demonstrated the value of cooperative collaboration.
Human Synergistics International thanks trainers, practitioners, consultants, and educators across the globe for making our team-building simulations the most widely used and acclaimed in the world.
When Human Synergistics first introduced the Desert Survival Situation™, our clients could not get enough of this innovative team activity based on the concept of synergy—that is, people working together can achieve better results than they can individually. The Desert Survival Situation has become one of the most widely-used team-building activities in the world and has served as the model for other numerous other exercises used for training and development internationally.
Human Synergistics’ team-building simulations provide a unique opportunity to quickly and objectively measure whether your teams are achieving synergy. They are designed for team building, developing more constructive group processes, and demonstrating the impact of communication and collaboration on solution effectiveness. HSI offers a wide variety of team-building simulations in four series.
Click here to learn more about all of Human Synergistics’ team-building simulations.